home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- I own the Syquest EZ-135 and am very please with it's performance. It's
- nearly as fast as my internal HDs, and is very well built. I had my hands on
- the Zip initially and returned it without giving it a try. I just didn't
- like the construction (very lightweight). The Zip has many excellent
- features though, and in all fairness, should be tried out before making your
- decision. For me it came down to three things:
-
- 1. The speed. The EZ is twice as fast (13ms vs. 27ms read time).
- 2. It hold 35Mbs more than the Zip, which means I can hold the same amount
- of frames on three Syquest disks, as on four Zip disks. (Saves $20.00)
- 3. Most of my clients and friends, who've been using Syquest removables for
- years, stayed with Syquest and got the EZ.
-
- Hope this helps, (Please let us *not* start a Zip vs. EZ war!) ;^)
-
- Mike
-
-
- <<Anybody got any input on the merits of the Easy Drive versus the Zip
- drive?>>
- . Michael McBride/CYBERGRAFX.3D
- . 76601.2354@Compuserve.com
-
-
-